🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.